<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jacobsen: District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141</link>
	<description>A view of law and life in Silicon Valley, the global technology center</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Law &#38; Life: Silicon Valley &#187; Jacobsen and FOSS Community Win Big in Jacobsen v. Katzer Settlement</title>
		<link>http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Law &#38; Life: Silicon Valley &#187; Jacobsen and FOSS Community Win Big in Jacobsen v. Katzer Settlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141#comment-262</guid>
		<description>[...] because it was the first case in the US about the enforcement of open source software licenses. http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141. This settlement is important because after a significant victory in the Court of Appeals for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] because it was the first case in the US about the enforcement of open source software licenses. <a href="http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141" rel="nofollow">http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141</a>. This settlement is important because after a significant victory in the Court of Appeals for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law &#38; Life: Silicon Valley &#187; Top Ten Open Source Legal Developments: 2009</title>
		<link>http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Law &#38; Life: Silicon Valley &#187; Top Ten Open Source Legal Developments: 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] of any specific and actual harm suffered as a result of the alleged copyright infringement” http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141.  This decision is disappointing for FOSS licensors and hopefully other courts will not impose [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of any specific and actual harm suffered as a result of the alleged copyright infringement” <a href="http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141" rel="nofollow">http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141</a>.  This decision is disappointing for FOSS licensors and hopefully other courts will not impose [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Open Source Software Ruling &#171; Oregon Business Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Open Source Software Ruling &#171; Oregon Business Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=141#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] just came across this post at the Law &#38; Life: Silicon Valley Blog about a recent update in the Jacobsen v. Katzer case in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just came across this post at the Law &amp; Life: Silicon Valley Blog about a recent update in the Jacobsen v. Katzer case in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
