Gartner just reported that 85% companies currently use open source software and the remaining 15% expect to start using it within one year. http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=801412. They noted that OSS is frequently replacing proprietary software for applications. For new projects OSS is being equally adopted for mission critical and non mission critical projects. TCO and reducing development costs continue to be the lead drivers of OSS adoption, but concern about vendor lock in with proprietary software remains important.
They noted that governance remains the number one problem. They noted that 69% of companies surveyed do not have a formal policy for evaluating and cataloguing OSS use. This number is even more dramatic than the findings of the survey for the DLA Piper Global Technology Summit. http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=108
Gartner notes:
“Just because something is free doesn’t mean that it has no cost,” said Laurie Wurster, research director at Gartner. “Companies must have a policy for procuring OSS, deciding which applications will be supported by OSS, and identifying the intellectual property risk or supportability risk associated with using OSS. Once a policy is in place, then there must be a governance process to enforce it.”
I strongly agree with this recommendation. As I have noted in the past, an open source use policy is essential for any company using software (in fact, a third party use policy is a more accurate description of the need because many “commercial” software components are readily available on the web). http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=18. The failure to have a OSS (or Third Party Software) Use Policy runs the risk that a company will be liable for monetary damages due to intellectual property infringement and may even be prevented from distributing its products due to an injunction. The recent Jacobsen case, in particular, raises the risk of injunctions being granted for failure to comply with OSS licenses. http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=64.
An OSS Use Polcy provides the best protection from these risks. And such a policy can be lure for the best programmers if it permits contributions by employees to open source projects. Many programmers now contribute to open source projects and want the assurance that they can continue to do so even when working for a corporation.
8 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
[...] Software news by Mark Radcliffe [...]
Pingback by » Gartner: Open Source Software Adoption Continues to Rise » Free Software — November 18, 2008 @ 9:09 am
software development…
Another important part of an online forex swap education is routine. I believe no matter how well you understand tradeoff or if you mark an A in a forex tradeoff module, the real deal comes when you in point of fact start interchange. Most trading site…
Trackback by software development — April 9, 2009 @ 6:15 pm
accountingsoft.info…
In our role as software advisors, we talk to a wide range of physicians and their staff to help them determine which EMR software is right for their practice. One things is clear: while most every practice understands that they need to move toward an E…
Trackback by accountingsoft.info — April 11, 2009 @ 7:25 am
free software solutions…
It happened these day. People subscribe the mailing list because they to know tips and guidance from famous internet marketeer. But they got… affiliate promotion every day. It more becoming legitimate SPAM on email. They not helping newbie with tips …
Trackback by free software solutions — April 13, 2009 @ 5:02 am
Trade Software…
“ Copy Handler is a free software for Windows systems, which allows you to take full control over the file copy and move operations. Program is highly customizable and fully integrates with the operating system. In addition, Copy Handler offers many …
Trackback by Trade Software — April 25, 2009 @ 9:22 pm
[...] This situation is a warning to companies that they need to have an open source policy and a process for managing their work with the open source software. See my earlier post, http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=107. [...]
Pingback by Law & Life: Silicon Valley » Microsoft & Linux: Did Hell really Freeze Over? — July 24, 2009 @ 8:05 am
[...] surveyed do not have a formal policy for evaluating and cataloguing OSS use.See my earlier post, http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=107. These use policies need to cover not just internal development but all sources of code which [...]
Pingback by Law & Life: Silicon Valley » Microsoft and Windows: Lessons on Managing Open Source Software Use — November 15, 2009 @ 7:23 pm
Lawandlifesiliconvalley…
[...] something about lawandlifesiliconvalley[...]…
Trackback by Lawandlifesiliconvalley — August 1, 2010 @ 8:16 am