The recent Intellectual Property Business Congress in San Francisco was very interesting and demonstrated the increasing importance of intellectual property of business http://www.ipbusinesscongress.com/2011. The speakers ranged from Judge Rader (Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit) to Ruud Peters (Chief Innovation Officers of Philips NV). Many speakers emphasized the critical nature of intellectual property in developing products because most new products are the result of collaboration among many parties. The rise of the need for collaboration in developing products ranges across all industries, from smartphones to automobiles.
Smartphones are a dramatic example of collaboration: the bill of materials for the iPhone shows that Apple only provides the operating system for the device. Android represents another step in this evolution where even the operating system is provided by a third party. The disruptive nature of these new reality is demonstrated by the dramatic fall of Nokia’s market share in smartphones (I discussed these issues in more detail in my presentation on the new rules of innovation at the IBF Corporate Venture and Innovation conference in February http://www.docstoc.com/docs/83629007/Managing-Innovation-for-Global-Entrepeneurs-and-Large-Companies).
At the conference, Frank MacKenzie, IP Counsel from Ford Global Technologies, stated directly that intellectual property at Ford has a much higher profile. He described how the automobile industry has changed dramatically recently because of the integration of a much greater amount of third party technology into new cars; he mentioned Sync and Mytouch as technologies which Ford has licensed from third parties. Even in the traditional automobile business, he noted that intellectual property is very important: he described how the sale of Volvo was initially viewed as the transfer of “hard” assets and a brand, but it became clear during the negotiations that intellectual property relating to the car manufacturing was a critical element of the deal for the buyer.
The most interesting presentation was by Ruud Peters, the Chief Innovation Officer of Philips NV, who described that evolution of the integration of intellectual property into business at Philips over the last twelve years. At the beginning, intellectual property was viewed as a “defensive” asset, but intellectual property is now a key part of all business strategies developed at Philips. His summary of the new attitude was: “Business strategy without an IP strategy is not a business strategy”.
No comments yet.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.